Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (9825)	2/8/2005 10:03:00 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Hi Searle, Re: After that, does the rest really matter? The key to ending the official charade is to somehow get the American public to look at the 9/11 evidence with a clear, unbiased appraisal of what it is that they are actually seeing. It has taken me a long time to conclude, as you do, that the WTC Tower collapses were planned demolitions. I certainly didn't want to accept some crackpot theory as proof, but I've now seen enough physical evidence, and evidence of a massive cover-up, to conclude that the buildings were deliberately destroyed by some force other than the airliner impacts and the fires in the towers. The public will accept the official story until some group is able to produce irrefutable proof that the official story is bunk, such as the Zapruder film provided in the Kennedy assassination. In that instance, Time-Life Magazine refused to show the Zapruder film to the public for years and it was only in 1969, at the New Orleans' District Attorney Jim Garrison's trial of Clay Shaw that the film got some traction with the public. Basically, we have the same situation today as we did in the 1960s. The government is involved in an official cover-up, and the public is, by and large, willing to go along with the deception. And the major corporate media is stonewalling requests for high quality video from the 9/11 Truth Movement.

To: sea_urchin who wrote (9825)	2/8/2005 10:43:29 PM
From: twmoore	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 20039

Ray > The March issue of Popular Mechanics magazine will feature a fairly extensive article attempting to debunk the various "conspiracy theories" regarding the events of 9/11. Isn't this what Rove is all about?Hit the opposition in their strength with lots of dis-information.Someone should try to chase down who is behind this article.Someone had to pay for the investigation to sort out all of the theories.