SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (60272)2/10/2005 10:26:45 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hello Maurice, <<North Korea>> ...

Mr. Chairman Mao would say, and did say, "There is chaos under the heavens, and the situation is excellent".

Nuclear democracy will likely be the new world order, and it will be an order that will likely be more stable than not, allowing small nations to behave like big powers, and ensuring national self-determination for all who sports the membership card at the members-only club.

This is the state of affairs the neo-cons expedited with their amateurish hog-wash and ridiculous hubris, and no, NMD will do naught, because it is only possible under laboratory conditions, and assumes a static anti-anti technology coma.

Here is Stratfor's read, or wishful thinking, figuring the lack of White House reaction is actually a part of deliberate tactic as opposed to bankruptcy of strategy and chaper 11 of ideas.

It should be worrying that N.Korea is supposedly selling their know-how and services, and if not stopped by any means, will lead to J6P paying that much more to maintain his standard of living. And this should be worrying to portfolio holders.

I remember informing that the Bush league are made up of amateurs when they first came to power, pumped up by "end of history nonsense, and new order hubris", readying to do China, got side-tracked, and now ... what a mess ... let's watch.

Chugs, Jay

North Korea's Nuclear Declaration
Feb 10, 2005
stratfor.biz
Summary

In a statement released by the official [North] Korean Central News Agency on Feb. 10, the North Korean Foreign Ministry said Pyongyang has "manufactured nukes for self-defense." The statement was uncharacteristically unambiguous regarding North Korea's possession of nuclear weapons -- at least as far as official pronouncements go. The question, then, is why raise the stakes, and why now?

Analysis

North Korea's Foreign Ministry has made the first official admission of the country's manufacture of nuclear weapons. In a statement directed at the United States on Feb. 10, the ministry said North Korea "had already taken the resolute action of pulling out of the NPT [Nuclear Proliferation Treaty] and has manufactured nukes for self-defense to cope with the Bush administration's ever more undisguised policy to isolate and stifle the DPRK." Before this point, Pyongyang has always played coy regarding its nuclear weapons program, preferring to claim the "right" to weapons or simply referring to deterrents and the ability to turn various cities into seas of fire.

Washington long has argued that North Korea has nuclear weapons -- with most estimates ranging from three to seven bombs -- so Pyongyang's announcement is more a question of motive and timing than a revelation. In addition, it is a rhetorical, rather than substantive, shift, as Pyongyang has yet to carry out a nuclear test; therefore the actual knowledge of the North's true nuclear capability remains unchanged. So why make the announcement, and why now?

The timing is particularly interesting. It comes on the first day of the Lunar New Year, the second most important holiday in the Koreas and a time when much of Asia is on vacation. This makes reaction times slower in Asia, but the message clearly is received in the United States. The statement criticizes Washington and Tokyo but makes no mention of Seoul -- perhaps a nod to the recently released South Korean defense white paper that no longer uses the term "main enemy" to describe North Korea.

North Korea has just undertaken a series of rallies and meetings extolling Kim Jong Il's Songun policies, and Kim's birthday -- an important occasion in the North -- is less than a week away. There have been rumors in the past couple of months of serious cracks in the North Korean regime, matched by conflicting rumors that Kim is preparing the way for another dynastic succession and is about to start raising one of his sons to a much higher status in the country.

In addition, Pyongyang has laid out hints that it is ready for dialogue with the United States and waited to see how Washington would address Pyongyang in Bush's second term. The response was, apparently, unsatisfactory. Pyongyang was anything but reassured by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's "outpost of tyranny" remarks because they lumped North Korea in with Zimbabwe in the rankings of U.S. foreign policy interests and indicated Washington's goal for North Korea remained -- and was perhaps even more so now -- all about regime change.

Pyongyang's new message of nuclear weapons possession was matched with calls for dialogue and a desire to de-nuclearize the Korean Peninsula. In reality, Pyongyang still wants to negotiate; it still wants a peace accord and diplomatic relations with the United States -- but only because that is considered an assurance that Washington will not try to topple the regime. That belief is fading, however, as Pyongyang has watched Ukrainian elections and realizes that diplomatic ties have little to do with non-interference in regime transitions. Thus, from Pyongyang's perspective, the only surety of security is through military power -- which is, not coincidentally, the very essence of Kim's Songun politics.

A source close to the North Korean regime says that although Pyongyang wants dialogue, it will not participate if there is no hope for a change of U.S. position. Pyongyang's statement is a final call for talks -- a narrow "window" of opportunity -- and if the talks are rejected, Pyongyang has basically signaled it will be unable to go back from its development and possession of nuclear weapons. This is not a new threat -- Pyongyang used a similar negotiating ploy in 2003 -- but the warning of a closing window is somewhat ominous since it hints at a nuclear test, which is an undeniable verification of North Korean nuclear capability.

And while public reactions are fairly muted -- after all, North Korea always negotiates through brinkmanship -- there are less open concerns that North Korea might not be bluffing, and that could lead to a reshaping of the security environment in Northeast Asia if Japan and South Korea, and possibly even Taiwan, fall like dominoes into the international nuclear club. Already, sources in the Russian Ministry of Defense say Moscow has quietly put the Pacific Fleet and Rocket Forces on high alert to prevent any U.S. incursion into Russian airspace should the rhetoric degrade into action.

The next move is Washington's. North Korea has set a very clear choice for the U.S. administration -- engage in a productive dialogue with Pyongyang directly or accept the reality of a nuclear-armed North Korea -- and the collapse of U.S. non-proliferation actions. North Korea is a cautious and careful planner, and a keen observer of global events, and while there is certainly a particular lens through which the nation's leaders and planners view things, their motivation is clear.

With the 60th anniversary of the founding of the Korean Workers' Party approaching this year, Pyongyang intends to be free from the U.S. box, whether through dialogue or nuclear tests -- and is banking on Washington either seeking to avoid the latter or reshape Northeast Asia into a region where all nations are nuclear-armed, thus reducing the significance of Washington's nuclear umbrella -- and influence.



Copyright 2004 Strategic Forecasting Inc. All rights reserved.

Reprint Rights:
Articles from Stratfor may not be reproduced in multiple copies, in either print or electronic form, without the express written permission of Strategic Forecasting, Inc. For mass reprint permission or content licensing, please e-mail marketing@stratfor.com for more information.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (60272)2/10/2005 10:31:03 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
Maurice, more nonsense and wishful dreaming from Stratfor, and if they represent the best analysis, then ... uck ... is your portfolio ready ? Mine isn't, not really.

stratfor.biz
Russia: Angling for a Role in a North Korean Drama
Feb 10, 2005

Summary

Russia will try to assume an active role in the developing imbroglio over North Korea's statement Feb. 10 that it possesses nuclear arms. The Kremlin sees both risks and opportunities in this globally important development. While taking measures to protect its security, Moscow also will try to use North Korea's announcement to ease geopolitical pressure from Washington and redefine U.S.-Russian relations. This attempt likely will fail.

Analysis

As a North Korean neighbor, Russia has grave concerns about escalating tensions between the United States and North Korea following North Korea's Feb. 10 announcement that it has produced nuclear weapons. From Russia's official statements, it is impossible to tell how Moscow will respond. So far, Russia has said only that, while it understands the country's security concerns, it regrets that North Korea made the statement.

Russia's concern is based on the possibility of a military conflict on its borders, the chances of which became significantly higher Feb. 10 than they were the day before. Russians are convinced North Korea is not bluffing. Russian intelligence has long maintained that North Korea has four to six nuclear weapons. Military and political sources in the Russian government say it is possible that North Korea has managed to almost double its supply of nuclear weapons in the last year. On the other hand, Russians do not see U.S. President George W. Bush, in his second term, having a second thought about ordering a missile attack against North Korea, which could result in nuclear war.

In fact, Moscow is so concerned that a U.S. strike against North Korea will come quickly, Russian military sources say, that Russian forces in the Far East were put on higher alert following North Korea's announcement. To avoid frightening the Russian people, and causing speculation abroad, Moscow made no public announcement of the heightened alert level, which is meant to prevent U.S. aircraft and missiles from violating Russian airspace en route to North Korea.

If the United States attacks North Korea, Russia is worried that the conflict -- including nuclear fallout -- could spill over into Russian territory. Russia also is concerned that the conflict may cause millions of North Koreans to flood into Russia's Far East, seriously affecting the country's security, demographic and even military situation in the region.

Moscow's greatest worry is its military weakness in the Far East, where the Pacific fleet is rusting, pilots cannot fly for lack of fuel and ground troops are underfed. If either side in a U.S.-North Korean conflict decided to take advantage of this weakness -- by over-flying Russian territory, say, or even demanding that aircraft or commandos be based on Russian soil -- Moscow would be hard-pressed to do much about it.

Russia also has a significant geostrategic concern that if the United States and North Korea go to war over North Korean nukes, U.S. forces will prevail and occupy North Korea, thus appearing on Russia's southeast doorstep and almost encircling the country. (U.S. and NATO troops are already in former Soviet Union [FSU] states along Russia's western and southern borders.)

So it is in Russia's best interests to become actively engaged in resolving the current crisis. By doing so, Moscow sees an opportunity not only to protect its interests in the Far East but also to redefine U.S.-Russian relations in light of the U.S.-led geopolitical offensive in the FSU, where pro-Moscow regimes are being neutralized one after the other.

With North Korea officially nuclear, Moscow believes, the United States will need Russia's help in dealing with the issue and may even take the six-party talks more seriously (Russians do not think the United States has in the past). Washington also might see the need to respect Russia's national interests and refrain from encouraging the kind of anti-government opposition in Russia that it has promoted in Ukraine and Georgia.

But Russian help with North Korea will not get it very far. It is not that Russia lacks the leverage, only that there are important factors that weaken it. One is that exercising some leverage, such as providing major new weapons systems to North Korea in return for some concession on nukes -- would defeat the purpose. Instead of receiving gratitude from the United States for easing the conflict, Moscow would receive Washington's ire for arming its enemy.

Another problem is that, while Russia has some tasty nonmilitary carrots to offer North Korea -- such as building a gas pipeline and trans-Korean railway -- these carrots are unlikely to be enough for North Korea, which sees the possession of nuclear arms as a matter of national survival. Stratfor believes Moscow could have some limited success in getting North Korea back to the negotiating table, but that would not be enough for Washington to reconsider its geopolitical advance on Russia.

Washington wants North Korea to renounce its nuclear program, and nothing Russia can do will accomplish that.



Copyright 2004 Strategic Forecasting Inc. All rights reserved.

Reprint Rights:
Articles from Stratfor may not be reproduced in multiple copies, in either print or electronic form, without the express written permission of Strategic Forecasting, Inc. For mass reprint permission or content licensing, please e-mail marketing@stratfor.com for more information.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (60272)2/11/2005 8:13:54 AM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hu Jintao is winning the chess game.

The world should unite and not let "little boys" play games that have consequences for a lot of people. This goes for HJ, VP, OBL, L'll Kim, Itolyouso, Tony B, GWB, and the whole lot of you including Jay, Maurice & the red state bloggers.

Who are you guys to decide who is bad enough that you have to kill?

All the great thinkers have said that peace is the answer.

Which great thinker has ever said that we must kill a lot of people so that some of us could live a better life?

Where did this stuff come from?