Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (28972)	2/11/2005 7:53:12 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 90947

I thought you said you'd never come back. Won't be posting here in any continuous manner like I did before, because this is not a place where free speech is upheld. You say you are against banning...yet you ban. The reason I left is because you banned me...twice. Then you go on crying about the other folks that ban. That makes you a hypocrite. I'm still lurking on occasion, and was moved to post when I saw DTK's post regarding your ban policy, which was the reason I quit posting here. I won't be posting in any significant way, except to underline the reason why I left in the first place. Folks that post here should know that they can be banned. That puts a damper on the free flow of ideas. It appears as though you are not a ban freak, but that is because you ban and then un ban. So the size of the ban list means nothing. Many folks have been banned here. And un banned too. But who wants to post where you are not given a chance to exchange your ideas freely? Intermittent banning has the same effect as permanent banning. Either you are for banning or against banning. You can't have it both ways, unless you are a hypocrite. Orca