Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (100371)	2/14/2005 12:39:38 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793637

No, that wasn't the question. I beg to differ. If you're responding to a post in which I ask a question, then "the question" is the question I posted, which was "Did he say that?" asked in relation to "Jordan had accused the U.S. military of systematically murdering journalists." The question was if Jordan said that journalists had been deliberately targeted by the US military. Which he clearly did. You are moving the goalposts. You're entitled to your question, too, but it's your question, not "the question" in our colloquy until and unless the subject changes from my question, the reigning "the question." Otherwise, you're the one moving the goalposts. As for your question, I didn't realize that it was still an open question. But I'm happy to answer it in the affirmative, close enough, if that helps to close any open loop that may be. <g>