Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (29339)	2/16/2005 11:23:19 PM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

I think it as just as bad for males/sons this young man will not escape the injury and stigma she has inflicted on him it will follow him the rest of his life it was hard to hard to testify in a public court at that young age and harder yet to deal with those complex emotions and feelings that get in the way of a having healthy sexual relationship

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (29339)	2/16/2005 11:28:42 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

I will go on record as saying that I, Agustus Gloop, being of sound mind and body, would kill (with my hands) a grown man who had sex with my 12 year old daughter - period! Sorry. You're going to have to take a number and get in line.

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (29339)	2/16/2005 11:37:50 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Death would be both painful and non negotiable And would constitue first degree murder, for which you would, in this state, you could face the death penalty. And while you might think morally it would be justifiable homicide, legally you would be totally wrong, and you would deserve to go to prison for it. Just as Mary Kay may have thought morally she was right to do what she did, but legally it was a crime and she rightly went to prison for it. Now, 400 years ago you might have gotten away with it. But as we've made clear here, we are no longer living by 400 year old standards of right and wrong. So don't even try that argument. <g>