SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (90961)2/19/2005 12:23:19 AM
From: jlib  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
Ah, upside down and naked? Still not sure how their technique helped them hide their position.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (90961)2/19/2005 1:43:38 PM
From: The Duke of URL©  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
What is really wrong with this picture. The "exchange" under its rules allows certain of its buddies, to "back away' from an offer.

You see it every day in the options market.

Now, I'm just noodlin here, but does that sound like a fraud on the unsuspecting public part of the market.

You see an offer and you put up your acceptance by offering at that price, and later you find out that there was no sale transaction completed?

Boy, I don't think there is a business in existence where I couldn't make money by having an undisclosed right to void any sale LATER if I wanted to.

That is why it is so hard to understand. It would not be legal in most of the rest of the world.

I buy the stock and short the stock. If the stock goes up that day I don't buy what I have already bought. I wait to do the same thing the next day.

Which is more illegal? The people who take advantage of this rule or the exchange which allows the rule in the first place.

All protected by government regulations.

Krimentelies, Mr. Wizard. Let's get a big picture thingy going here.

Where is Dicky Grasso, now that we need him?

Remember when he said that the exchange should not be open more than 8 hours a day because it was too much work for the brokers?

Well, the real reason is how else could you trade those 7 trillion dollars in fund shares after the market closed and the holders of those funds could not. All with the knowledge of the NYSE, all claiming it was legal because it was buried deep somewhere in a two hundred page joinder agreement.

Duke, J.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (90961)2/19/2005 2:26:47 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
Here is story that talks about their past endevors:Securities schemers seek solace in Boca


Published Saturday, January 10, 2004
by Dale M. King

Boca Raton is a Mecca for both the upwardly mobile, the idly rich and retirees looking to gear down from life’s fury.
It’s an interesting mélange – one that doesn’t always lend itself to a symbiotic relationship.
Boca – the city considered by many to be a gem along the Gold Coast – is also home to many white-collar scoundrels and scam artists whose prey often includes senior citizens whose naiveté and trust can become their unfortunate undoing.
When not scamming and scheming, these white-collar weasels scurry away to multi-million dollar homes in guarded and gated complexes where visitors are anathema and secrecy is the order of the day.
Consider Woodfield Country Club, the cream of Boca’s high-end communities. Among those who sip pina coladas at the poolside and jog the tree-lined streets in Spandex pants is Kenneth Tripoli.
Well, Tripoli isn’t sipping and jogging these days. He’s doing time in the pen for participating in alleged money laundering, conspiracy, mail fraud and wire fraud. He is scheduled for release this year.
Tripoli’s family is awaiting his return at their Woodfield home.
Nearly four years ago, Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau held a news conference announcing that 22 people had pleaded guilty, and another 20 were indicted, in connection with “activities stemming from their varying roles” in the activities of Meyers Pollack Robbins Inc., a securities firm charged with enterprise corruption.
The indictment accuses seven people with acting as “owners and operators of Meyers Pollack offices.”
But Tripoli, Morgenthau said, used another person’s name and license to run his own MPR Inc. franchise.

DA outlines scheme
The Manhattan DA said all eight “taught their brokers how to sell securities by fraud,” selected specific securities to sell for themselves and falsified records of their transactions.
Boca Raton may not have a lock on securities cheaters and schemers, but it has an ignominious reputation for drawing telemarketing scammers and securities rule-breakers into its midst.
In vast numbers, say government regulators.
Consider the case of Daniel Porush, one-time president of Stratton Oakmont Inc. Working for him were nearly 200 stockbrokers and salesmen who specialized in luring unwary investors into risky ventures with promises of fast bucks.
When the house of cards fell apart, Porush sought refuge where many other scandalized millionaires looked to breathe free – Boca Raton.
According to real estate records, Porush bought a Palm Beach condominium in 1995, then moved to Woodfield Country Club in Boca in 1998.
By the way, when he was kicked out of the securities biz, he was fined $250,000, lost his securities license in seven states, pleaded guilty to securities fraud in New York and was ordered by arbitrators to pay $23 million to customers.
Lots of people have given up the cold-calling life for the warmth of sunny Florida, basking behind the hallowed walls and secretive gates of Boca neighborhood developments.
Joseph Tuozzo, a former broker at Harriman Group Inc. – or HGI – of Jericho, N.Y., owned 2 percent of the company. He moved to Boca Raton in August 1998, buying a $460,000 house with his wife in Woodfield Country Club.
There’s also the case of Brian Scanlon, a stockbroker at Stratton Oakmont from 1990 to 1992 and former president of HGI.
When the firm went belly-up, its ex-leader found solace in a $1.69 million home in Royal Palm Yacht and Country Club in Boca Raton. He put the house in his wife’s name.
The couple, however, has since moved back to New York.
Many ne’er-do-wells put the wife’s name on the property – just in case the bank comes calling. But in Florida, with its heavy emphasis on property rights, even those who take the bankruptcy route aren’t likely to lose their homes.
But you never know.

Bounced from the biz
Also no stranger to Boca Raton is Jordan Shamah, former managing director and partner in Stratton Oakmont. He bought a home in Balboa Point, Boca Raton, then sold it a year later. He was bounced from the securities biz and then indicted with three others
on charges of securities fraud over the Internet.
Stratton Oakmont also disgorged Scott Forman, who went on to work for Biltmore Securities in New York. He’s in a Boca home that he bought for just under a half-million dollars.
He was suspended from the securities industry in 1998 for failing to pay back a former client.
Stuart Litman, former president of Maidstone Financial Inc. of New York – a spin-off of Stratton Oakmont – moved to a home owned by his wife on Sanctuary Drive in Boca Raton in 1997. He moved back to New York a year later.
Barely two years ago, five men – two from Boca – were indicted on charges of securities fraud, according to Alan Vinegrad, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Kevin Donovan of the FBI.
Among those charged were David Davidson of 5015 Blue Heron Way, Boca Raton and Lloyd S.M. Bierne of 18690 Long Lake Drive, Boca Raton.
Charges arose out of “schemes to manipulate the prices of securities of two small-cap companies, Big City Bagels Inc. and Pallet Management Systems Inc.,” the law enforcement officials said.
So while big-city and big-dollar schemers continue to seek out Boca Raton as a safe haven, authorities try to crack their stranglehold on the illicit market.
Said Vinegrad: “This case reflects the government’s continuing commitment to investigating and prosecuting stock brokers who abuse the trust of investors, and to foster the confidence of the public in the operation of the securities market.”

Send this page to a friend



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (90961)2/19/2005 2:32:04 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Big City Bagel scheme allegedly cooked up by indicted shoe mogul
Nation's Restaurant News, July 10, 2000 by C. Dickinson Waters
Save a personal copy of this article and quickly find it again with Furl.net. Get started now. (It's free.)NEW YORK -- Defunct sandwich operator Big City Bagels Inc. is at the center of an alleged securities fraud and money-laundering scheme detailed in a federal indictment of shoe mogul Steve Madden and principals of the Purchase, N.Y.-based brokerage firm Monroe Parker Securities Inc.

Madden is a shoe designer and retailer best known for his trendy platform shoes.

Federal prosecutors in two different U.S district courts in New York and officials from the Securities and Exchange Commission allege that Madden conspired with two brokerage firms to manipulate the prices of public stock offerings -- among them, Big City Bagels, which was based in Hicksville, N.Y.

According to the charges, Madden purchased large blocks of stocks in companies immediately after their initial public offerings by Monroe Parker and then, in a practice known as "flipping," resold the shares back to the brokerage shortly after they began trading.

Madden, 42, pled not guilty to all the charges and was released on two separate bonds of $750,000 each. According to Madden's lawyer, Joel Winograd, "Mr. Madden denies any improper conduct, and we will defend him vigorously."

The indictments specifically detail a scheme in which Madden lent $200,000 to Big City Bagels as a "bridge loan" in exchange for 100,000 bridge units. It is alleged that at the time of the loan, Madden also agreed to sell the bridge units at times and prices directed by Bryan Herman, a principal of Monroe Parker.

Big City Bagels changed its name to VillageWorld.com Inc. and ceased operations as a food retailer after a July 1999 reverse merger with VillageNet Inc. and Intelligent Computer Solutions Inc. The transaction, in which the two private technology companies merged with and acquired control of the publicly traded Big City Bagels, was initiated by the technology firms simply as a means of gaining access to the public marketplace.

According to Peter Keenan, president and chief executive of VillageWorld, he and his partners had zero interest in the food business and engineered the acquisition of Big City Bagels because it was a public company with an established franchise operation that was failing and therefore "in reach" financially. At the time Keenan and partners took control of the company, Big City Bagels was trading at 50 cents a share.

According to Keenan, the remaining bagel franchisees were expected to continue on in business on their own. VillageWorld.com Inc. provides targeted Internet services to specific "communities of interest" and plans to market a low-cost, set-top computer that can be plugged into a TV.

The recent indictments revolve around a "lock-up" agreement Madden entered into with the brokerage firm. Under the agreement -- noted in the registration statements and prospectus prepared for the Initial Public Offering of Big City Bagels' stock -- Madden purportedly agreed not to sell the 100,000 bridge units for a 13-month period following the company's IPO.

Within hours of Big City Bagels' May 1996 IPO, Monroe Parker allegedly released Madden from the lock-up agreement, and he sold all 100,000 of his bridge units to the brokerage firm for $2 a share. At that time, the market price for the units was $13 a share.

Madden faces a host of other charges involving both his own company, Steven Madden Ltd., and his relationship with Stratten Oakmont, an alleged penny-stock "boiler room" operation, so called because of its high-pressure sales tactics. In all, the former shoe salesman and Cedarhurst, Long Island, native faces a total of 17 charges. If found guilty of all counts, Madden could face as much as 25 years in prison as well as hefty fines.

Adding to Madden's problems is a civil suit brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission, seeking to force him to disgorge his allegedly ill-gotten gains with interest and pay a civil penalty. The SEC suit also would ban Madden from serving as an officer or director of any public company, including his own.

Madden has "temporarily relinquished his role" as chairman of Steven Madden Ltd. pending the resolution of the charges against him, according to a company spokesman. He will, however, continue to serve as the chief executive of the firm.

COPYRIGHT 2000 Lebhar-Friedman, Inc.
COPYRIGHT 2000 Gale Group