Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (38077)	2/23/2005 12:37:56 AM
From: one_less	Respond to of 173976

"However, I do not believe it gets to the heart of the religious rights' argument. What is at the heart of the religious right's argument and what is at the center of the fanatical left's agenda is neither resolvable in congress nor sensible for reasonably intelligent beings seeking to determine a fair, just, and peaceful coexistence.

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (38077)	2/23/2005 9:51:43 AM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

The problem with liberals is that they see everyone's side. Time for liberals to stop being so understanding, and start standing up for basic rights. I agree with that. Kerry's position on Civil Unions was completely a sell out to Bush's proposed constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. If Kerry had any balls at all he would have said he was for human rights, and for the right of anyone to marry who they wish. And then he should have said to Bush, if you're for an amendment to the constitution, could you at least show us how that amendment would read? Bush never intended to push for such an amendment...it was pure political posturing. I'm still befuddled about the difference between a civil union and marriage. Is it church sanctification that makes the difference? I thought the church was to have no hand in government? Orca