Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougSF30 who wrote (151522)	2/23/2005 12:24:42 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

"Based on what? AMD still says H1 2006 for 65nm" Based on them supposedly having new 90nm designs coming out in 2006. If 65nm is due H106, then they wouldn't be doing that. Of course, if Presidio and Pacifica are 65nm, that would be different...

To: dougSF30 who wrote (151522)	2/23/2005 12:51:53 PM
From: eracer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Re: Based on what? AMD still says H1 2006 for 65nm. Got a link? Where and when was the last time AMD said H1 2006? I believe they have in the past, but I don't recall how long ago or in what context (sampling?, wafer starts?, shipping for revenue?, full blown product launch and availability?) Re: Why not? AMD says early 2006 for mobile dc: Nothing in that Inquirer article says 65-nm. Do you have a link which states 65-nm? Taylor and Trinidad could be 90-nm like all of the other new dual core Presidio/Pacifica CPUs to be launched in early 2006. Taylor could just be Presidio/Pacifica version of the 30W 90-nm 1.6GHz Opteron due this year. Trinidad could be similar to the 2.0-2.2GHz 90-nm 55W Opteron.