Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Castle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (4494)	2/28/2005 5:20:10 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7936

and yet, there are no conservative pundits in arms over Coulter's outrageous statements.......with the lone exception of the NRO. Getting fired from NRO is a pretty big exception, and it isn't true that no other conservatives have been upset with her statements. But even if it was does that mean that liberals should not condemn someone who basicaly said the 9/11 victems deserved what they got? Ward Churchill is not an Ann Coulter. No liberal believes that the 9/11 victims deserved what they got. But I agree with Pat Buchanan when he says that America's past foreign policies helped lead to the 9/11 event. As for condemning Churchill, why bother......the right is so all over it that its overkill. You are creating a martyr. Shouting "Ann Coulter" any time conservatives or others try to take liberals to task for something this outrageous isn't much of a defence. I don't think you understand the impact of a Coulter or a Hannity. Their comments re. liberals are inexcusable. If liberals were a small minority, they might be able to get away with it. As it is, there will be a back lash. ted