Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (673457)	2/26/2005 12:05:32 AM
From: Wayners	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

My point has to do a lot more with selective enforcement of laws rather than being anti police. Take a look at the zillions of laws on the books. You would think they would all get enforced equally, but they do not. However that being said, the police have a saying that everybody comes home alive every night. Police also will not respond to gunfire in a bad part of town in many cities unless its automatic weapon fire. Police don't have a duty to respond. The courts have said so. The Police only have a general duty to defend the public at large. Waaaaay too big a job. Much of the heavy lifting should be in the hand of individual citizens who don't cost the taxpayer a dime. I like the CCW laws a lot. I hate the victim disarmament laws tremendously.