Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (158543)	2/26/2005 12:44:16 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

..."The president believed the intelligence agencies of the world." Would it not be much better to have a president who deliberately lied to the people because he thought a war was essential than to have one who was so dumb as to be taken in by intelligence agencies, especially those who told him what he wanted to hear? That would presume that the intelligence agencies of the world actually thought and claimed Saddam had WMD. I never saw anything from the Russians or French that Iraq had WMD; both of them asked for the proof. And the Russians, more than likely, had the most accurate intelligence in Iraq as they had a solid presence in country. How long can Bush get away with lies? I think the US election answered that question. For 50%+, Bush can get away with it indefinitely. jttmab