Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (158545)	2/26/2005 6:04:16 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

LOL!! Ignoring the reality of course that every major intel service in the world believed Saddma had WMD or it having been verified earlier that SH did possess them, unable to prove that they had been destroyed.....and in light of 9/11...Bush did what he had to do.... Liberal "logic" never ceases to amuse me......the "Bush lied" chant is a dishonest and cheesy claim clung to by Bush hating scumbags.... J.

To: jttmab who wrote (158545)	2/27/2005 5:03:34 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The proof is always in the pudding. The fact that Israel did not attack Saddam proves to me that they knew he was bluffing and had no WMD's. Even I had a good idea he was bluffing. That's how Arab men play the game. Israel had more to lose than anyone and they didn't attack. The inspectors claimed there was no trace of WMD's and they wanted to complete their job. Was it worth all the lives that were lost? I guess that depends on whether or not you lost a loved one.