SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandintoes who wrote (30042)2/26/2005 11:59:27 AM
From: Augustus Gloop  Respond to of 90947
 
I don't think we can open that can of worms in the name of preventing nuclear proliferation. If Iran will come to the table in good spirit this can be averted. If they continue their quest for nuclear arms then I believe we can use conventional means (air raids and conventional rockets) to set them back many years. It is not in Iran's best interest to rock the boat at this point in time. As of earlier today Russia and Iran had postponed their agreement on the transfer of nuclear fuel. Thats a step in the right direction



To: sandintoes who wrote (30042)2/26/2005 12:19:06 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
I'm troubled that there seems to be a lessening of resistance to the use of Nukes.

Nuclear weapons have been used offensively on two occasions in the last 55 years. An attitude that tolerates or accepts even limited use of nuclear weapons would not be a good thing, IMO.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News