SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rock_nj who wrote (10156)3/1/2005 2:38:13 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
rock,

Let's not exagerate. The South Tower only stayed up for 55 minutes after it was grazed by the B-757-200 and most of the fuel was spilled outside the building in a spectacular fireball.

The cognoscenti believe that the South Tower had to come down at 9:58 because the handlers were panicking about the fires going out and the cover story being blown (ouch, pun intended).

I think these videos of the wonders of gravity tell us all we need to know about the destruction of the WTC Towers:

reopen911.org

Be sure to check out the new materials there on Madrid's Windsor Tower conflagration and Jim Hoffman's refutation of the Popular Mechanics straw man arguments.



To: Rock_nj who wrote (10156)3/1/2005 8:42:26 AM
From: LPS5  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
Even setting aside that you're evidently assuming that the buildings were constructed similarly: wouldn't, and shouldn't, the damage that the aircraft plunging into the building be taken into account as a differentiating factor?

I'd think so.

e


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News