SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (102840)3/1/2005 12:35:07 PM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964
 
I thought that discussion was pretty evenly divided here. None of us are qualified to tackle the more scientific elements, but over all the discussion was lively and constructive. I'm not sure minds were changed but several of us vented and gave valid opinions.

That's what I like about "here." Where else can you participate in conversation with total strangers and come away with so many different perspectives? ( maybe Barnes and Noble???) The "food for thought" aspect alone makes it worthwhile imo.

M



To: Lane3 who wrote (102840)3/1/2005 12:38:31 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793964
 
Summers transgressed the mores of his social milieu. When you do that, you provoke outrage.

I think it's reasonable for the social milieu to be self-policing.

I think you know when you're going to tick people off but don't care because you don't share their mores, and don't care to fake it.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News