SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tonto who wrote (675268)3/15/2005 7:15:52 PM
From: ManyMoose  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Actually, I am not opposed to windfarms, although they certainly dominate the landscape and carve up any turkeys that are dumb enough to fly through.

I used to live in Oregon, which prides itself on being the first to try any environmental scheme that comes along. A lot of people put in windgenerator towers back in the 70s, but the weather consistently shredded them to bits.

Another scheme was small hydro. The federal government subsidized anybody who wanted to dam up a tiny little stream to produce a minuscule amount of power, and we had to give them permits if they wanted to do it on national forest land. I think some of those installations may still function.

If you've ever seen the Kevin Costner movie "The Postman" some of the scenes were filmed on a hydropower installation that for many years was the most efficient in the world. Water flow was regulated from a man-made lake through a stream to another lake where it was fed into a big pipe and transported several miles to another lake, whereupon it was given a precipitous 300 foot drop before it drove the generators at the bottom. The turbines turned so fast they generated a lot of electricity for the amount of water that went through them. When they had to stop the generators, the water column blew many yards across the river before the pipe emptied. You can see some of this in the background in one of The Postman scenes.

Another cockamamie idea (I thought) in the same area was to pond up water in a high valley, let it down for generation during peak periods and pump it back up during low demand to regain the head. One other idea was to dam up a river, pipe it underground through a tunnel into another drainage, and generate electricity there. Hydropower in my view is efficient but insidious because it puts good bottom land under water.

The archipelago in Southeast Alaska intrigued me because in places it had two tidal cycles a day of more than 20 feet in some places. Tides don't look like they're doing much, but that is one heck of a lot of water moving along there. There oughta be a way to harness the power of tides somehow.

Solar power was popular for a while, and my brother put in a rooftop generator. His neighbors complained bitterly about the reflection from it.

Geothermal power seems like a win-win, if you can get the temperature gradient. Iceland is close to 100% geothermal, if I'm not mistaken.



To: tonto who wrote (675268)3/16/2005 4:10:15 AM
From: sandintoes  Respond to of 769670
 
You could plant a lot of tulips and call it a mini Holland.

Jennings Takes Snide Shot Over Difficulty
to Improve View of U.S.


Peter Jennings on Monday night uttered one of the kind remarks which earn him his smug image as one eager to denigrate the U.S. Following a soundbite on World News Tonight of Karen Hughes, the Bush administration's new Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy, saying "perceptions" of America "do not change quickly or easily. This is a struggle for ideas," Jennings snidely interjected: "In some parts of the world, that will be taken as an understatement."

Jennings announced on the March 14 World News Tonight: "Also in Washington today, the Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, announced the appointment of Karen Hughes to the post of Undersecretary for Public Diplomacy. Ms. Hughes, one of the President's most-trusted advisers, will be in charge of improving America's image aboard."
Hughes, at press briefing about her naming: "This job will be difficult. Perceptions do not change quickly or easily. This is a struggle for ideas."
Jennings asserted: "In some parts of the world, that will be taken as an understatement."

Seconds later a news item read by Jennings, the MRC's Brad Wilmouth noticed, suggested many in the Middle East share a quest for democracy: "In Lebanon today, the biggest demonstration in the nation's history. Almost 800,000 people, almost a quarter of the country's population, rallied in Beirut for the withdrawal of Syrian troops and an investigation into the assassination of the former Lebanese prime minister. Rafik Hariri was murdered a month ago. The demonstration today by those Lebanese opposed to the Syrians was intended as a response to a smaller demonstration organized by the militant group Hezbollah last week."



Thomas: Democratic Rumblings in Middle
East Make Press Look "Bad"


Newsweek Assistant Managing Editor Evan Thomas declared on Monday's Imus in the Morning that "I just love" the rise of democratic activity in the Middle East "because it makes the press look so bad." Recalling the media's ridicule of all the problems President Bush's Iraq policy would cause in the region, Thomas, now teaching a writing course at Harvard University, dismissed the arguments from reporters against giving Bush credit: "They say, 'Well, he got lucky, Arafat died and,' you know, 'the Syrians assassinated that former Prime Minister, and it's really not Bush, it was just kind of an accident.' Well, you know, that's nonsense." Thomas proposed that "if it's possible to have a good war -- and I don't know if it is, but if it is, it was, because it enabled those elections and those elections have enabled a lot of people in the region to think there's a chance to take control of their lives."

Thomas appeared by phone during the 6:30am EST half hour of the Imus in the Morning show on MSNBC simulcast on radio. He informed Don Imus of how he's away from Newsweek for a while teaching expository writing to freshmen at Harvard University.

The MRC's Jessica Barnes caught the scolding of the media by Thomas, prompted by Imus asking: "So with what's going on throughout the Middle East, these various demonstrations of a thirst for democracy?"
Thomas: "I just love this story because it makes the press look so bad. I mean, I hope it all works out and we do get peace and freedom in the Middle East, but my short-term, narrow entertainment here is that, you know, all the chattering classes, all my friends, including me, were all saying 'Oh,' you know, 'Iraq was a terrible thing and Bush has screwed up the Middle East and we're just creating terrorists and nothing's going to work here and it's the end of the world,' and then the next thing you know, peace and freedom and democracy are breaking out and they can't explain it. You know, they say, 'Well, he got lucky, Arafat died and,' you know, 'the Syrians assassinated that former prime minister, and it's really not Bush, it was just kind of an accident.' Well, you know, that's nonsense. I mean, Bush, this is a case where his absolute inflexible, stubborn insistence that he was going to do it his way, I think is turning out to be the right thing to do. And however horrible the Iraq War has been and there are a lot of dead soldiers and maimed soldiers and all that, you know, it turns out their sacrifice was for something, it wasn't just for nothing, it wasn't just because some politician screwed up. That may be the beginning of something huge happening in the region of actual freedom beginning to break out, and if I was the parent of one of those soldiers, I would be feeling a little better now. Maybe not great, but a little better because I think it's gonna -- I think, think, it's early -- it's going to turn out that that war was, despite the WMD and all that, that war was a meaningful war, if it's possible to have a good war -- and I don't know if it is, but if it is, it was, because it enabled those elections and those elections have enabled a lot of people in the region to think there's a chance to take control of their lives and get rid of their, you know, their crummy old governments."
Imus: "Of course, Tom Friedman's been writing about that forever."
Thomas: "Yeah, he was pretty lonely. I mean, Tom Friedman was, you know, a lot of his liberal friends were sneering at him and he was taking a lot of heat for that position. He was a pretty lonely hawk on the war and a lot of people were saying, you know, ‘What happened to Tom Friedman? He's gone overboard and,' you know, 'completely wrong.' Well, it turns out Friedman was right."

Last year, Thomas recognized the obvious about the media bias in favor of John Kerry, but a recognition resisted by his colleagues. As recounted by the July 12, 2004 CyberAlert:
The media "wants Kerry to win" and so "they're going to portray Kerry and Edwards as being young and dynamic and optimistic," Evan Thomas, the Assistant Managing Editor of Newsweek, admitted on Inside Washington over the weekend. He should know. His magazine this week sports a smiling Kerry and Edwards on its cover with the yearning headline, "The Sunshine Boys?" Inside, an article carrying Thomas' byline contrasted how "Dick Cheney projects the bleakness of a Wyoming winter, while John Edwards always appears to be strolling in the Carolina sunshine." The cover story touted how Kerry and Edwards "became a buddy-buddy act, hugging and whispering like Starsky and Hutch after consuming the evidence." See: www.mediaresearch.org

See item #4 below for confirmation of Thomas' prediction