Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taro who wrote (224888)	3/18/2005 6:09:18 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571738

>That part of the sentence is truly bizarre IMO. If an unborn baby, a fetus, can be murdered, of course abortion is equal to murder. But since that is not the case according to current US laws, giving him the needle for double murder when in fact one was "nothing more" than terminating a pregnancy, is truly bizarre. Pick one, trying to have it both ways is utter nonsense. That's the point... it's a foot in the door to overturn Roe v. Wade... -Z

To: Taro who wrote (224888)	3/19/2005 2:55:02 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1571738

Two, there's a political issue here -- Lacey Peterson was eight months pregnant, and the unborn baby died as well, and as such, it was a double homicide case. If that baby was murdered, then is abortion not murder? That part of the sentence is truly bizarre IMO. If an unborn baby, a fetus, can be murdered, of course abortion is equal to murder. But since that is not the case according to current US laws, giving him the needle for double murder when in fact one was "nothing more" than terminating a pregnancy, is truly bizarre. Pick one, trying to have it both ways is utter nonsense. What idiocy........you might want to forget about law school. ted