SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: coug who wrote (98679)3/18/2005 11:02:24 PM
From: coug  Respond to of 108807
 
Actually, I am kind of thinking more of whether any living organism can cause "global cooling". I don't think so if I know the definition of 'cold'which is the absence of heat and if I know the definition of 'living'.

And IMO, any living thing we know of, at least I do, uses calories to sustain itself. And calories by our definition is a raising of temperature by a energy-producing substance..

Just thinking out loud..



To: coug who wrote (98679)3/19/2005 12:20:13 AM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I'm talking specifically about things like the rapid deforestation of the earth, all forests but particularly rain forests are the most crucial. Whatever is going on naturally, we are less able to sustain ourselves if we ourselves destroy Mother Nature.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News