Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (104866)	3/18/2005 11:23:57 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793897

He didn't ask for her to be in this situation, and he is doing the normal thing that is done all over the country when this happens. i disagree.... instead of taking his rightful responsibility to ask for life support to be terminated when he had standing without challenge, he waited until he had won a malpractice lawsuit (only then, years later concluding she was 'gone') and then petitioned the court to act as her surrogate instead of himself, opening up the door for the court challenge from her family imo, it was his refusal to exert his rightful authority and foisting it upon the state that has brought us to this juncture

To: LindyBill who wrote (104866)	3/19/2005 8:00:27 AM
From: JDN	Respond to of 793897

Thats one side, the other side is her "husband" deserves a beating. He has ignored her for years, kept her in an isolated environment, even attempted to forbid her family from visitation. How can you be sure he isnt COVERING UP something? jdn

To: LindyBill who wrote (104866)	3/19/2005 8:05:00 AM
From: DMaA	Respond to of 793897

Actually, I was thinking about politics and the Republican party when is said it was really really bad. I think they are walking into a trap, set not by the democrats, but ( unintentionally) by the well meaning save Terri crowd.