Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (225576)	3/21/2005 8:47:03 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572107

>>> Did he take out different marriages liscences with each of the women? If he did not how could it be argued that he was married to them? If he was not married to them how can he be charged with marrying more then one person? I haven't any idea. I think he had like 20 children and there were allegations that he had abused the state's welfare facilities as well. I just remember thinking at the time that a guy who fervently believes in a religion that permits (or even insists upon) polygamy ought to be able to practice his religion without government interference. There was an issue that one of the wives was only (dare I say it?) 13 when they were married. I don't know. Just struck me as strange a person couldn't do that if they chose to.