SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (159400)3/21/2005 11:29:33 PM
From: rich evans  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I can never understand this argument in the press and here about Saddam. I met a lady who was born and lived in Fallujah. She can't understand it either being and Iraqi and knowing them well.

In 1998, the UN inspectors documented , inventoried a lot of chemical and biological WMD. This is a fact.

The ISG under David Kay could find no evidence, documents or people who could show that the WMD was destroyed. This is a fact.

So do you believe in magic. My friend of Fallujah doesn't. She says the Iraq's had to have hid it or removed it or both.
David Kay concludes that they moved the WMD in the ISG report based on testimony and satellite photos of trucks at the Syrian border.

What degree of evidence do we need in intelligence matters?
We can't prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt so does that mean we are wrong? We can't prove anything with a preponderance of evidence so do that mean no WMD is hid or moved?
Well we have some evidence- some would say substantial evidence that WMD is hid or removed since the alternative that it was destroyed has no evidence.

And what about the other arguments which Bush and Blair especially used for the invasion namely- UN resolutions, and humanitarian.
So this preoccupation with NO WMD FOUND seems a little stupid to me as it certainly did not go poof.
Whether we can pull off the transformation of Iraq to a peaceful domocaracy and change the dynamics of the ME is another issue.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (159400)3/22/2005 12:01:07 AM
From: Orcastraiter  Respond to of 281500
 
No manufacture. You cannot advocate rattling the sword - but don't use it, never use it! - and not deserve the name of an empty bluffer. But people can tell if you mean business, and all the empty threat will garner is a bluff that is called.


There you go again. You didn't read my post. When Saddam looked down the gun barrel he folded his tent. He still remembers Gulf War I.

Orca