SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (105737)3/24/2005 2:49:09 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 793708
 
But Tribe was wrong when he said that the constitutionality of the statue was a threshold issue before considering the injunction.

I did not understand him to say that. I understood him to say that that the constitutionality of the law would need to be determined before having a de novo hearing as prescribed by the law. But it was three ayem when I saw it and you're a lawyer and I'm not so maybe not.

Yes, that was a good show, in contrast to everything else that has been showing. I will tune in again today and hopefully get the same quality of information.



To: Ilaine who wrote (105737)3/24/2005 9:08:27 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793708
 
CV, do you know offhand if Terri's parents ever filed a suit early on to try to get the guardianship of Terri from Michael to themselves? Especially, since he went on with his life, had eventually a common law wife, and two children....?

If they didn't, I wonder why they didn't.

Also, is Michael a bigamist? He has a wife, and a commonlaw wife...plus kids. Or is the 2nd woman not a commonlaw wife, since he is still married....?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News