SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (226162)3/25/2005 12:53:54 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574852
 
I tend to agree, but isn't lethal injection against the law?

Strange how it's okay to "starve someone to death" but not use lethal injection.

Regards,
Amy J



To: Dan B. who wrote (226162)3/25/2005 2:28:17 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1574852
 
My reason for posting is to say she shouldn't be starved to death. Kill her quick, I say, or not at all.

In most states, "killing her quick" is considered murder.

What courts decide proves nothing absolutely, but aside from that controversy, killing her this way simply ought not to be.

The MDs involved with the case have said repeatedly she will not feel anything. Given her lack of reaction to the feeding tube, I am inclined to believe them.

ted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News