SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin Rose who wrote (39737)3/25/2005 8:25:02 PM
From: geode00  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Right-o, it's a return to the 1920s. IMO the rightwing radicals do not care if we go backwards as long as their wealth and that of their families and friends resemble those of the robber barons. They have images of 'cottages' in the Hamptons maintained by the working poor to whom they do not have to pay a decent wage or provide decent working conditions.

We are, at any rate, back to the wage gaps of the 1920s and Bush is trying to widen the gap even more by every means possible:

- killing Medicare, Medicaid
- cementing the tax cuts to the ultra wealthy
- killing SS
- killing liability for corporations (tort 'reform') while cementing liability for individuals (bankruptcy 'reform')
- transfer of even more wealth from individuals to corporations (Medicare drug bill, war)

He thinks he can do this by bankrupting the US Treasury, destabilizing the country to the point where everyone will be anything out of sheer fear. He saw the tremendous effect of fear after 911 and he's looking for something else just as destabilizing. Bankrupting the country might just do it.

Who knows? Maybe the Schiavo case has opened the eyes of even some Republicans to the potential power of the government to control every aspect of our lives down to the most intimate and heart wrenching decisions.



To: Kevin Rose who wrote (39737)3/25/2005 9:06:31 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
I think there are a number of Republicans (really, the neocons) who want SS to fail.

The neocons have been quite clear that they want to decrease the power and influence of the government until it is less than that of the corporations. Their reasoning is that the corporations run on merit and the government runs on pandering. They want to destroy any program that might make the government more popular. It's not that they don't realize that there will be problems when social security is broken, but they think the private sector will handle it more efficiently.

Of course their actions aren't actually leading to smaller government, but then their actions from Iran/Contra to Iraq to Social Security have not been well thought out or executed.

TP