SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (106557)3/29/2005 2:23:08 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793622
 
BTW, one of the things that doctor mentioned was that an MRI, as you said, shows no more than the CAT scan

But the other Dr. disputed that, saying the CAT scan doesnt show electrical activity (meaning brain activity) and that he has seen patients lose a great deal of their brain and still be taught to be functional. I mention this as it is not as cut and dried as you are saying based upon the public information. Perhaps if the judges had allowed more thorough examination, you would have been proven correct and we all could rest more easily. jdn



To: Lane3 who wrote (106557)3/29/2005 2:25:34 PM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 793622
 
Sewing doubt over the state of Terri's cranium is politically useful but irrelevant to them. Heard one Terri advocate on TV the other night say she should be given an MRI. The host asked what if it showed no higher brain activity? The advocate said it doesn't matter, that's would be no reason to kill her. Their position is if artificial feeding can keep someone alive it must be continued, regardless of whether the person has a brain or not.



To: Lane3 who wrote (106557)3/29/2005 2:37:55 PM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793622
 
I have neither seen or heard anything to the affect that her brain is mush....other than by people on SI who support the removal of her feeding tube, and speculation by some in the MSM. I've heard conflicting opinion from a few doctors that have examined her. Is there definitive report available online?

Maybe the fact that very few of us know this for a fact....and all of the "evidence" is hearsay......gives us reason to be cynical.

If TS's brain is liquified then I can't see prolonging her life. The argument then becomes....do we starve her and refuse hydration, which seems cruel and unusual to me, or do we end it quickly, as we do for so many who live on the edge?

I can see how two issues in particular that will be discussed and given much attention: how do we assist those in a pvs or otherwise have no hope, but have left no living will, and how do we write laws that best protect their rights.

I don't know, but these questions must be addressed imo.



To: Lane3 who wrote (106557)3/29/2005 2:44:21 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793622
 
One of the things enflaming the case is that there just isn't enough data public about Terri's neurological function for even doctors to be sure what's going on. Krauthammer (a psychiatrist by training) said he tried to figure it out and gave up. All we know is that she is not literally brain dead - she's breathing without a respirator - but has extreme brain damage, pvs according to the doctors.