SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (106773)3/30/2005 10:23:19 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793812
 
He's more concerned with the structure which will support a "coherent ideology" than with the content of one.

Bradley, and others who are proposing this approach by the Dems, are working on the premise that "if we build it, the ideas will come." They might as well try. I know that a lot of the "Silicon Millionares" who support "moveon" etc, are in favor of this approach.



To: JohnM who wrote (106773)3/31/2005 2:33:50 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 793812
 
Ideology is a dependent variable in Bradley's argument

Dependent on what? The delivery structure, the 'pyramid'? That seems rather counter-intuitive, doesn't it? Almost like saying, "hello, this isn't what we actually believe, it's just what our current political structure permits us to endorse"?

I mean, we all know it happens in real life but I've never heard anyone put it forward as an argument for reform, lol.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News