Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taikun who wrote (472)	4/5/2005 9:29:58 PM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25575

That's why Bush was left to clean up the 911 mess that Clinton should have dealt with. Get real. Clinton did stop the threats that occurred on his watch. And the incoming fool was warned numerous times and did nothing. Too much of Clintons energy was spent fighting idiots like Starr or he probably would have taken care of bin Laden before 9/11, and not three years and counting later....

To: Taikun who wrote (472)	4/5/2005 11:59:04 PM
From: NOW	Respond to of 25575

i would rather avoid poltical discussion, but you seem to give governments an awful lot of credit for doing the right thing....

To: Taikun who wrote (472)	4/8/2005 2:06:49 AM
From: kryptonic6	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25575

It would not appear they're being told to ramp up nuclear power right this very minute or Peak Oil will damage the economy. CNN.com - Cheney urges 'fresh look' at nuclear power - May 8, 2001 Vice president favors using more coal, oil exploration on fed lands archives.cnn.com WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Nuclear power can both solve America's energy woes and help protect the environment, Vice President Dick Cheney told CNN on Tuesday. The answers, Cheney said, lie in increasing the supply of energy sources -- a policy that would include giving nuclear power "a fresh look." .... Cheney foresees an additional 1,300 to 1,900 new power plants over the next 20 years to meet demand -- some of which could be nuclear plants -- along with a number of refineries to process oil. "By our own choice we have not built new refineries in over 25 years," Cheney said. .... Cheney told CNN that conservation would be an important part of the energy policy, but said that with energy consumption rising, "we can't close the gap ... unless we provide additional supplies."