Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shades who wrote (27277)	4/12/2005 5:04:35 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

I would hope we would not invade turkey for water You really think that is a possibility? That US would invade a country on the other side of the world so they can bottle up its water and take it home? Sorry, but I can't take that seriously. Your military is buried neck-deep in Iraq, which had arguably the weakest military of any country US was not friendly with. Especially now, it is unthinkable that US would consider invading Turkey, the region's largest military force. And for what? Water of two rivers, which are flowing downstream on their own as we speak anyway? You are a smart guy Zonder LOL. I thought you would remember from our previous discussion on childbirth that I am not a "guy" :-) why would Mr. Perkins say that iraqi water was important to our invasion interests and our presence in the middle east along with oil? The most likely explanation seems to be that you must have misunderstood.