Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (109751)	4/16/2005 8:35:09 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793822

Now, as to the point. I said the concern that an exemption for the health of the woman would not reduce the number of those abortions, just reassign the reason, was valid. You say not. If you can handle another multi-paragraph post, please explain to me why. I've walked around this post twice and still don't see what's at stake. You clearly think I misunderstood your original point but, for the life of me, I can't understand what about my own response was off target. I may have to go get that beer with the warrior. I think, however, after reading it again, we are, as someone once said on another SI thread, vigorously agreeing. I doubt three or four lengthy paragraphs will bring us closer.