SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (229721)4/18/2005 2:15:55 PM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576601
 
The Japanese are calling it the Nanking "incident" where only 20-40k Chinese were killed.........big discrepancy and the Chinese are outraged.

Fine, but this is the type of detail that should be in the news. I've seen spots on this situation for 3 weeks, and the "Chinese" side's demands are not really made clear. It's not that hard for a news station to say "This is exactly what the textbook says blah, blah, blah", and this is what the Chinese think it should say "blah blah blah". And then its odd that the Japanese don't provide some explanation (which makes sense to me) along the lines of "we don't think it is good to educate our 7 year olds that Japan raped and murdered 30 million Chinese from 1930 to 1945. We'll teach them that when they are 16." Or something like that.

The story "The Chinese are upset about a textbook which glosses over wartime atrocities" should be a headline, not the complete story.

I have this complaint about TV news a lot of the time. They often make zero effort to provide any detail beyond the obvious.



To: tejek who wrote (229721)4/18/2005 3:07:03 PM
From: Taro  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576601
 
Which figure do you personally believe is the right one, Ted?

The 300k posted by the victorious or the 20-40k claimed by the nation losing the war?

Taro