SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (27840)4/19/2005 12:03:39 PM
From: Roads End  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Great, give us your reasoning why sugar is going to be such a strong performer. Do you really have one or were you just being rude?



To: LTK007 who wrote (27840)4/19/2005 12:50:50 PM
From: Bid Buster  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Sugar is going up long term and Mish is no guru.



To: LTK007 who wrote (27840)4/19/2005 12:52:19 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
What the H did I say?
I asked for a reason as I did not see anything to like about the chart.

What is going to fundamentally require a rise in the demand of sugar? I insulted you and Rogers? Give me a break I asked a question.

Why cant enough sugar be grown to accommodate demand?
Is sugar underplanted?
If so why does the chart look like it does?

Where did I say you was an idiot?
Where did I say rogers was an idiot?

Please explain the "solid foundation" for sugar or is it being rude to ask a simple question these days?

If you want to talk about rude look no further than this absurd comment yo made.
"With Haim here, next thing i will discover you have become a neo-conservative"

Calling me a neo-conservative if funny.
Dragging Haim into this conversation is both rude and silly.
FWIW Haim appears to like sugar here and you attack him.

Again all I did was point out the chart and ask a question.
WTF has gotten you so hypersensitive today.

Now, do you care to explain the case for sugar or not?
Mish



To: LTK007 who wrote (27840)4/19/2005 1:35:19 PM
From: regli  Respond to of 116555
 
Don't take things personally. This is a forum with varied opinions. Diversity of opinion is greatly appreciated as it broadens the investment horizon.

Please continue to post.



To: LTK007 who wrote (27840)4/19/2005 2:06:38 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Respond to of 116555
 
Could you explain? >> With Haim here, next thing i will discover you have become a neo-conservative. <<


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News