Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (4704)	4/23/2005 8:21:23 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37663

I know that the rest of Canada may now consider Harper and his group as a legitimate replacement for the liberals. It would make sense as the man is honest and intelligent. They too could save Canada. However, the Conservative are an absolute no-go here. At least for the time being. And I am not sure there is time for them to find the right people before the next referendum. Maybe it is just to late!

To: marcos who wrote (4704)	4/23/2005 9:41:31 PM
From: tyc:>	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37663

>without ever throwing out the devils you know. The question is not whether they should be thrown out, but whether they should be thrown out before all the facts are fully investigated. I suppose you imply that you know enough already, so throw 'em out NOW! Martin, in his speech, essentially admitted responsibility, because it happened on his watch as finance minister, just as the contra affair happened on the great "conservative's" watch. However, in contrast to that analogy, when all the facts are known, if he even stands for re-election, it will be because he promulgated the judicial investigation and punished the legally-proven wrong doers. If he runs, it will on his record as whistle blower. Can you say with certainty that to throw 'em all out NOW is not a case of throwing out "the baby with the bathwater" ? >>"Conservative' has an uphill struggle, too reminiscent of inherited privilege, divine right of bureaucracy and routine military adventures". So the conservatives are so only in name? Their proclivity to military adventure is conjured up by their name, not by their past performance. Hah! That's very imaginative, Marcos. How long have you been reading this thread ?