Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (161069)	4/26/2005 12:01:20 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

He has a very interesting way of adding his comments into news stories. Nowhere does it say that bush lied but he plugs it in an attempt to deceive. Ken would have kicked his sorry ass out of here long ago for doing this. Sly is well known hater and leftwing extremist on SI and IHUB. Unfortunately for us he landed here. Story he references is and interesting one. Mike

To: Suma who wrote (161069)	4/26/2005 1:58:39 PM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

>>>How could we have been lied to by so many of our leaders ? Yup. Certain moron stupid idiots hear what they want to hear. Lies and all. And that describes the republican party and their supporters to perfection.

To: Suma who wrote (161069)	4/26/2005 2:08:57 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

Sorry you had to hear that from Silly. I tried to warn you. The man is just plain dumb. mike

To: Suma who wrote (161069)	4/26/2005 2:23:03 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Sy and his crowd are working on the theory that Bush et al were so bent on war with Iraq that they deliberately picked as their chief reason something they knew was a lie, so it could blow up in their faces and make them look like idiots the moment American troops entered Iraq. This is their reasoning. Even if you believe that Bush is utterly Machievellian, this just makes no sense at all. Bush could have stressed Saddam's support of terrorists, his flouting of UN resolutions, his starving of the Iraqi people or the hundreds of thousands of dead in mass graves. He didn't have to pick on WMDs.