Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (43513)	4/28/2005 8:12:51 PM
From: Wayners	Respond to of 173976

Post cold war its pretty hard to defend the weapon system acquisition part of the defense budget. We still need lots of troops but not the aircraft at 125 million a copy or submarines at 3 billion a copy.

To: bentway who wrote (43513)	4/28/2005 8:16:05 PM
From: Wayners	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

Yea why should I pay a higher tax rate being a meager middle class person than the truely rich who don't work jobs at all and have all that idle income. At least Bush actually mentioned the words captial gains and dividends when the tax cuts were given. I've never ever heard Clinton or Kerry ever even mention the words..instead they just said "anybody making over $100,000 a year was "rich"". That tells me that Clinton and Kerry never ever intended to REALLY tax the idle rich. Somebody working a JOB at $100,000 with a family as say a good dentist isn't rich at all.