SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: twmoore who wrote (16191)5/8/2005 10:36:12 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 361165
 
How do you explain it? I think they would have fallen if Donald Trump walked over and sneezed on them, because fastenings were removed and explosives were put in place, then detonated. And another thing, I sincerely doubt that those so-called hijackers were flying the planes. AT least two of them couldn't drive cars, and it's a certainty the pilots would have ditched the planes rather than fly them into the buildings. Those planes weren't controlled by anyone in any cockpit. IMO



To: twmoore who wrote (16191)5/8/2005 11:57:25 PM
From: CalculatedRisk  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 361165
 
Neither tower was hit with a "glancing blow". Both towers were hit head on.

I see nothing sinister here (with the towers collapsing).

I agree that Bush's reaction is scary - either he knew something or he was paralyzed. But I think the 2nd explanation is more believable - the guy is a doofus.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News