Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (16292)	5/9/2005 10:48:29 PM
From: ThirdEye	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361160

The line of questioning you pursue can be used to refute virtually any evidence presented in almost any "case" to which it is applied. You do not simply want evidence. You want to attack logic itself(black is white) as it is applied to the behavior of your president himself and those around him. You or anyone else who cared to could possibly refute virtually any evidence presented, short of actual video of the act, that Bush has "lied" or deceived all of us. You could claim Bush is "not a crook" like Nixon. You could claim Scott Peterson is innocent or play semantic games a la Clinton and say that maybe Monica wasn't actually wearing the blue dress at the critical moment when DNA was applied. But the bottom line is simple. The buck stops at Bush's desk, and we already know that politicians in general and this administration in particular play the game of "plausible deniability"(Tom DeLay) as a high art. So you either haven't been paying attention or you have denied your own common sense to sustain your root beliefs and maintain as a matter of faith, not fact, that Bush is not a liar. Have a nice day.