Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (19982)	5/11/2005 11:29:54 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

I said <A fetus is not exclusively comprised of the womans body> I can only surmise you agree with me because your answer assumes this is true. "It is a parasite within the woman and relies solely on her for survival." What is a new born child suckling on the mothers breast? "Whether it is a wanted or unwanted parasite is the question." Same thing for a new born parasite. We don't kill new borns who are unwanted unless you live in Atheist China of course where it is just fine as long as it's a girl. "Your "the egg is a person" argument is not really an argument." Of course it's not; and I have never said that an egg is a person. I say a fetus is a human being and all humans are by nature persons. "In the theory of your God--whatever does not flow from free will flows from an Intentioned and Insistent God. To say that anything was chaos or random would be to deny the omnipotence and the control of your alleged Creator. If your God repeatedly and intentionally disposes of fertilized eggs--He is clearly setting the guidelines." What was that famous debate line: "You are no John Kennedy!" What God does is His business. You are no God and do not sit in life and death judgment of others. Yours is a specious argument.