Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (233048)	5/16/2005 5:06:39 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574681

"Could it be that to the right, ANY liberal bias is bad? " Well duh...

To: tejek who wrote (233048)	5/16/2005 6:43:16 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574681

why is the right going after PBS. I cannot speak for the right. Those of us in the center are offended by biased reporting funded by taxpayers. If commercial companies wants to exist on liberal dollars, it is their right and in the long run their valuation will reflect their decision(s). Public funding of propaganda aimed at progressing one party's agenda is wrong. What if the government gave money to Fox News? (Well, ok, that is not a fair example, because they are balanced.) But what if the government funded a Republican leaning network? You would have kittens. PBS Bests Networks in Election News Would you be impressed if I told you I could high jump seven inches? How about seven feet? To say that PBS is less biased than people like Dan Rather and Hark Halperin is setting a very low standard.