SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (114383)5/18/2005 12:36:19 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 794147
 
The hard proof of the back end of the transaction is missing.

Can forensic accountants find the numbered bank accounts? Probably not.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (114383)5/18/2005 1:59:00 AM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794147
 
you have tracked the oil vouchers from Saddam, but you never tracked the money to me.

Its a solid argument. It is one thing to say Saddam passed money, it is entirely different to say "I received the money"



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (114383)5/18/2005 6:58:33 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794147
 
they have his partner giving over $600,000 to his charities or political funs. this was the money flow. Galloway doesn't dispute it. He admits up front his partner or friend gave him $600,000 and his friend is very generous. this the kick back money. no other proof is required to see Galloway didn't receive money. He wouldn't directly answer questions concerning documents etc. he was a loud mouth person throwing all kinds of slander around which he knew was his right if he appeared. It was his show , they couldn't stop that , but they were hoping he would open up a little on document questions which he didn't.

He got the money and he says prove it. Now how much does he take out of his charities for living expenses , other non charity expenses.

bbc account of yesterday is not the way i came away from the hearing.