Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (114571)	5/18/2005 2:40:43 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794042

Dont you just love horse trading. How about going from 60 to 55 on judicial appointees because of life term rather than elimination? I am just picking a number. Do any of us really know what the credentials of these judges are anywaqy? I dont have a clue about local judges. Does anyone really feel comfortable that this admin talks of Clarence Thomas as possible CJ? Thats probably will come next if nuclear option taken. And CT doesnt make me feel warm and fuzzy. Would rather have a more accomplished judge whether liberal or conservative. Scalia deserves it but Thomas, give me a break. mike