SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (162903)5/23/2005 2:30:32 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hindsight is always 20/20.

The fact is we now KNOW for sure that SH is no longer a threat to the US and that he can not give WMD to terrorists....war would not have been necessary if SH simply opened up and provided the information sought.....you simply can not blame our leaders for SH's duplicity.....



To: michael97123 who wrote (162903)5/23/2005 2:37:48 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 281500
 
In hindsight the case for war should have been made differently. But the case never really rested on WMD; it rested on the nature of the Saddam regime and the coming collapse of sanctions. Do you think the Mideast would be better off with Saddam free of sanctions, triumphant, funding terrorists all over the place and being bowed down to in fear by the Arab League? I don't. Realistically speaking, that was the choice that we had to make.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News