SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (115841)5/24/2005 9:57:20 AM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 793824
 
Arent there four more judges after these three? Thats what they were saying on the news and thats what Buchanan said on IMUS.



To: carranza2 who wrote (115841)5/24/2005 10:03:15 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793824
 
Remember Bob Woodward predicts Cheney will run. I dont know if any of you watch the TV show 24. Last nite was the concluding episode. The President was a particularly weak individual who became pres when the pres was incapacitated. He exuded no confidence. MY wife mentioned to me a comparison between him and edwards or quayle who might have been as weak in crisis. I mentioned Truman as one who proved the other point. Both of us realized we were comfortable with Cheney as Veep so i thought about Woodwards comments again. Mike



To: carranza2 who wrote (115841)5/24/2005 10:14:03 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793824
 
Reason prevailed

The Democrat's position does not seem reasonable. They have been brutal in excoriating the three judges they are now letting through. I thought they were unacceptable out of the mainstream extremists. Now suddenly they're OK? Sounds irrational, not reasonable.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News