SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grainne who wrote (105485)5/31/2005 9:34:15 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 108807
 
I'm SO annoyed by this. Partisanship is to be expected, but to let it hurt kids is just so stupid and wrong. Blech. Who cares WHY Schwarzenegger was doing a good thing? The fact is he was doing one. Darn it.:

Spending Plans Fall Victim to Politics By Evan Halper Times Staff Writer
1 hour, 36 minutes ago


SACRAMENTO — The plan to partner the state with local farms to get fresh fruit on school breakfast trays hardly seemed controversial, and it wouldn't have cost much.


But it apparently had a fatal flaw: It was championed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

The Legislature swiftly rejected the $18.2-million program in budget hearings this month, leaving the nonprofit group that pushed for the project stunned.

"We didn't see this coming at all," said Ken Hecht, executive director of California Food Policy Advocates. "We were shocked."

Some Democrats even suggested that the governor's inclusion of the food program in his budget plan was a political stunt, an effort to obscure an overall strategy that leaves schools without funding for basic services.

Administration officials have said repeatedly that such programs represent creative thinking and are part of their push to find new ways to improve conditions in schools.

The fresh fruit project was one of several advocated by the governor and caught in the political crossfire between him and Democrats in recent weeks.

Democrats are so angry at Schwarzenegger over a number of his policies that they appear especially determined to block items that might win him points with the public as he tries to boost sagging approval ratings.

"The relationship between Democrats and the governor is at an all-time low," said Democratic strategist Darry Sragow. "You have to view these budget issues in the context of everything else going on in Sacramento, including what appears to be an impending special election. Anybody who is trying to get their program funded is going to have to deal with those cross-currents."

The Democrats have targeted a few big items, like the governor's plans to spend $100 million reducing class size in low-performing schools and to boost the pay of teachers in those schools. Major school groups had criticized them as window dressing to divert attention from much larger education needs they say are unmet in Schwarzenegger's budget, and Democrats were quick to agree.

But grass-roots groups were taken aback to see the Democrats dismiss so many of the smaller initiatives the governor sprinkled into the proposed budget he released May 13, such as the plan to bring fruit to schools.

Among other programs that have fallen by the wayside as the political tussle intensifies are a measure to help seniors get affordable prescription drugs, a nurse training initiative at community colleges and an expansion of vocational education classes for seventh- and eighth-graders.

Proponents of the projects find the situation frustrating.

"The money it would take to fund our program would be hardly visible," said Hecht, who says the state will probably spend $115.7 billion next year. "The value of it is wonderful. But here we are, caught hostage in the midst of a political tug of war."

Some say they sympathize with Democratic lawmakers, who want the governor to put back in his budget billions of dollars for local schools, social services and healthcare before they sign off on his new proposals.

Scott Lay, budget director for the Community College League of California, said there is no question that Schwarzenegger's "budget insulted local schools." But now Lay's group, too, is caught in the middle of the dispute.

An Assembly budget committee blackballed a $10-million program this month to expand nurse training programs at community colleges. Committee members voted instead — against the advice of the league — to put the money into other community college programs.

"It made no sense," Lay said. "Here we have a commitment from the administration to address a chronic nursing shortage…. I'm perplexed as to why the Assembly decided to do this."

Assembly Budget Committee Chairman John Laird (D-Santa Cruz) said many of the programs being rejected were paid for with one-time income from a state tax amnesty program. Such money, he said, should not be used to create ongoing programs.

"The governor says to us: We need to be fiscally prudent," he said. "We are being just that."

Laird stopped short of promising that Democrats won't be pushing for any new programs during the horse trading that will go on behind closed doors in the coming weeks.

Indeed, some of the governor's proposals could reemerge in those bartering sessions. But getting them approved would be an uphill battle after budget committees have pulled so many of them out of the legislation that ultimately will enact the budget and will serve as the platform for Democrats going into the final talks.

"We will continue to fight for these initiatives," said Department of Finance spokesman H.D. Palmer. "But given the way they have been treated so far, the organizations that worked with us on them are more than entitled to be livid with the Legislature…. For the most part, these things were rejected with little serious discussion."

Complicating matters for the governor, he has yet to have any meaningful budget negotiations with legislative leaders, even though the June 15 deadline for lawmakers to pass a budget is a mere two weeks away.

The standoff has been fueled by the special election the governor says he is planning to call this year. On the ballot in such an election would be measures to cap how much the state could spend on schools, social services and every other government program, as well as a politically incendiary proposition that would limit the ability of unions to use member dues to help fund political campaigns. Unions are among Democrats' biggest donors.

The governor has tried to use the prospect of the special election to extract concessions from Democrats. So far, however, the tactic has had the opposite effect. A public opinion poll released last week shows little enthusiasm for such an election among voters, strengthening Democrats' resolve to resist the governor.

That resistance is working against even programs supported by traditional allies, such as groups seeking lower-priced medicines for seniors. Mark Beach, a spokesman for the AARP, said he was surprised at how quickly Democrats disposed of the governor's $11.7-million Cal RX initiative earlier this month, which would have involved the state working with pharmaceutical companies to provide discounted prescription drugs for low-income Californians.

"It's disappointing when partisanship ends up doing away with a program that brings real benefits to Californians," he said.

Beach said that though he understood the concerns of those who say the program doesn't do enough to help make prescription drugs more affordable, at least Cal RX was a start. But now it appears the state will go into the new fiscal year without a program to bring down drug costs.

"We realize this program wasn't the be-all and end-all," Beach said. "But we were trying to get people help this year. We thought this would be a good first step."

Laird said the program was poorly designed. "You need to start with a good program and agree to fund it."

Beach said he believed the vote was more about politics than policy: "Partisanship poisoned the waters."

In most cases, the nonprofits trying to keep their programs from being rejected are doing all they can to stand on the sidelines of the partisan battles. But the executive director of one group jumped right in.

Jim Aschwanden, who heads the California Agricultural Teachers Assn., said he grew tired of watching the politically powerful California Teachers Assn. and other education groups stand by as schools were forced to abandon technical education programs due to lack of resources.

"They are not negotiating for our kids," he said. "They are just trying to get the best benefit packages for their members."

So Aschwanden signed on as a co-chairman of the governor's Coalition for Education Reform, a group of educators that has parted ways with the CTA and other major school groups to support Schwarzenegger's education agenda. That agenda includes spending billions of dollars less on education than is called for under voter-approved formulas, but also encompasses the programs intended to boost achievement in the poorest-performing schools. The governor is also seeking to increase the amount of time it takes for teachers to receive tenure.

Aschwanden's outspokenness may have helped get a $30-million pilot program to bring more vocational education to the state's middle schools into the governor's budget. The program was killed in committee.

*



To: Grainne who wrote (105485)5/31/2005 11:37:32 AM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 108807
 
So if you want to call it profiling, fine

It's not what I call it that matters. It's what it is.

You apparently based your assumption on the fact that he grew up in a certain area and had a certain sounding surname.

But if the Bush administration had a policy that everybody who grew up in Saudi Arabia and had a Muslim-sounding name should be more highly suspected of being a terrorist than someone who grew up in Ohio with the name of Smith, well, we know what the ACLU would say about that, don't we?



To: Grainne who wrote (105485)5/31/2005 11:51:25 AM
From: JeffA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
You will like this person. Even though her activities should be considered illegal and unethical.

Bane of Companies, PETA Spy Reveals Self By BONNIE PFISTER, Associated Press Writer
Mon May 30,11:54 PM ET


TRENTON, N.J. - Lisa Leitten is finished living her double life. For the past three years, the soft-spoken, 30-year old moved from Missouri to Texas to Virginia, applying for jobs at businesses dealing with animals. She gave her real name, and some real details about herself: a master's degree in animal psychology and prior work at a primate sanctuary in Florida.

ADVERTISEMENT

What she didn't reveal was that she was also working for an animal welfare organization, and that she wore a hidden camera to document instances in which animals were treated with what she calls horrific neglect and cruelty.

Leitten called her last assignment for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals her most wrenching: nine months in a Virginia lab owned by Princeton, N.J.-based biomedical firm Covance Co. There, she says, monkeys were denied medical care and abused by technicians. The company denies the claims, says it treats the animals properly and has accused Leitten of illegally working under cover.

Two weeks ago, PETA presented Leitten's assertions about Covance in video footage and a massive report to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration, and Virginia prosecutors, calling for regulators to shutter the company's Vienna, Va., lab.

"This was my third assignment, and my final one," Leitten said in a recent interview with The Associated Press, the first time she has publicly revealed her identity. "You never forget the things that you've seen."

Leitten grew up an animal lover in a middle-class family in Buffalo, N.Y. While in college in Ohio, a psychology class took her to a zoo to study chimpanzee behavior.

"My love of primates grew from that," she said. "They are such intelligent, feeling animals, so like us."

She earned her graduate degree at Central Washington University's Chimpanzee and Human Communication Institute, famously home in the late 1960s to a chimpanzee who learned sign language.

While in college, Leitten had become a vegetarian and found herself increasingly concerned about animal welfare. PETA was a natural fit.

But she was more comfortable working behind the scenes than marching in rallies. The intrigue of undercover work outweighed her initial worries.

"At first I thought, 'There's no way.' The fear of everything, of having to wear covert equipment and move around. But then it sounded sort of exciting at the same time," she said.

Her first job began in May 2002, a nine-month stint at a Missouri lab that produced pet food for Proctor & Gamble's Iams label. There, she claimed she found animals that were injured, had untended wounds and receiving unnecessary surgeries. Leitten documented her findings, quietly left the job and let PETA make her allegations public.

Retailer PetSmart and Iams severed contracts with the lab, which laid off nearly half of its workers. Its owner accused PETA of playing on corporations' fear of negative publicity rather than exposing legitimate concerns.

By July of 2003, Leitten resurfaced at her next assignment, a wildlife refuge in Amarillo, Texas. PETA said it had received complaints of tigers and monkeys housed in waste-laden cages and being fed spoiled food.

Six months later, Leitten slipped out of Texas, and PETA held another news conference with another damning video. A subsequent USDA review backed up the group's assertions.

For what she says was her final assignment, Leitten was hired as a primate technician for Covance.

Leitten's camera work, and the report issued by PETA, depict frightened monkeys being yanked from their cages and handled roughly by aggressive, often cursing technicians.

She says she watched animals suffer with festering wounds, and that tubes were forced into their sinuses for research medicine to be administered, causing them to scream, bleed and vomit. Monkeys were housed alone in cages that were hosed down with the animals still inside, dripping and shivering, she said.

Laurene Isip, a Covance spokeswoman, says the company has complied with animal welfare regulations for its half-century in business, and doubted the credibility of PETA's charges.

The company called Leitten's actions illegal. Legal experts agree.

"As an employee she has a legal right to be there, but she's there to fulfill and execute on the tasks and responsibilities give to her by her employer. She's not there to fulfill her own private agenda," said Scott Vernick, a Philadelphia lawyer specializing in professional responsibility and legal ethics.

Bruce Weinstein, who has written four books on ethics, said even noble ends do not justify deceptive means.

"The question is, can those perhaps noble ends be achieved legally and ethically? Can one legitimately document abuses that occur without pretending to be someone one is not, or breaking the law, or videotaping things surreptitiously?"

Mary Beth Sweetland, PETA's research and investigations director, said she now has two staffers working covertly, the latest of dozens of investigations conducted by the group's over 25 years.

In some instances, as at Covance, PETA says its moles have signed nondisclosure forms and claim to try to stay within the law by never removing anything from work sites or by revealing proprietary information.

So far only one company that's been infiltrated has sued: product-testing lab Huntingdon Life Sciences. The Somerset County-based company dropped its case in return for PETA promising to not infiltrate it again for at least five years.

"It's a risk we're willing to take," Sweetland said. "If it weren't for these investigations, no one would no what was going on."

For her part, Leitten says her time as a spy was spent worrying about the animals, not about being caught. She said she spent nights at home with her two dogs, weeping and writing up what she had seen during the day.

"That's why people only last in this job a couple of years," said Leitten, who asked that her current residence not be revealed. "I get migraines, a lot of anxiety. But if something can change for the animals, and their lives will be better in some way, then all those sleepless nights and crying at home will be worth it."

___