SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (235138)5/31/2005 8:00:54 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573564
 
Iraq invaded Kuwait, tried to destroy Iran, and threatened Saudi Arabia.

All that was prior to 1991. Post 1991 Iraq was powerless.

In addition, Saddam was one of the biggest donators to Palestinian suicide bombing, which is a direct threat to Israel.

It is not a military threat to Israel. And in any case, it is not something that Israel was incapable of dealing with, by itself, unlike Kuwait in 1991.

Everyone was afraid of Saddam.

Turkey? No. Kuwait? No. Not in 2002. Iran? No. If everyone was afraid of Saddam, why didn't any of the neighbors, notably Turkey, support the invasion? In 1991, many of the neighbors provided troops and military bases to attack Iraq from. In 2002, regional support was conspicuous by its absence.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (235138)6/1/2005 1:42:29 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573564
 
Saddam deserved to be deposed and the world is better off without Saddam in charge of IRaq.

This is absolutely correct. The failure of the United Nations to remove Saddam from power demonstrates the inherent shortcomings of that organization.