Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (10764)	6/3/2005 6:00:34 AM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Most people aren't asking questions for the simple reason most of them don't realize there are questions that have not been answered, or at this stage of the game it might be more accurate to say many of the questions have been answered and controvert the official story. IMO, one of the most obvious examples of the degree to which the US media has kept this information out of the public eye is the Mariani RICO suit. The level of effort that has gone into attempts to dismiss the suit, and the subsequent failure of those efforts, is news that should be reported in a big way. Early on, it was just barely possible to squint at the case, play devil's advocate, and say, "Well, maybe we're looking at a bunch of conspiracy nuts, and the suit is frivolous.". The fact the case has survived those kind of attacks for a year, and is poised to go forward, makes Watergate and Iran Contra look like school boy pranks. By all rights, this should be news of an order of magnitude that every sighted person in America should know about it down to the last dirty detail. There should be journalists pouring over the complaint, discussing the details on the nightly news, writing editorials, blocking out time slots for special reports, etc.. That perhaps one person out of a thousand is even aware the complaint exists as an active case is staggering. As you and I have discussed on and off this board, I remain of the opinion the only way to run an end play around the media blackout is to publish a concise, comprehensive and coherent account of the issues and evidence involved, then mass distribute it door to door. Unfortunately, that sort of consolidated effort is unlikely to take place in the current environment of mud slinging throughout the 9/11 research community. As near as I can tell, something close to consensus exists on the majority of issues and core evidence. Yet instead of concentrating on those specific areas, the entire community has somehow fractured into internecine warfare over side issues and the more speculative aspects of the attacks.