SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (684767)6/5/2005 10:27:09 PM
From: Wayners  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
There is no such as a mandate. Its whatever you are able to get through the House and Senate regardless of what the popular vote is. I don't think there is any correlation between the popular vote and ability to get legislation thru the congress.



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (684767)6/6/2005 12:17:09 AM
From: Mana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
MO though... anyone winning by just ONE state (*especially* in an election cycle when there was no big vote-drawing third party effort to siphon-off votes) ain't got a 'mandate'.

I would guess picking up more seats in the Senate and House could be included in that mandate. The winners ran their races on Bush and his policies.

BTW I am still trying to figure out if you're a libertarian or a democrat. You say you're libertarian, but the ones I work with tend to hate both parties. I can't remember ever seeing you bash a socialist or their philosophy/ideas...Just curious.