Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Citizens Manifesto -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (6)	6/11/2005 2:01:26 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 492

then what's good for the middle class is almost by definition pragmatic. Yes, but one must be careful of order. The one does not cause the other. BTW, have you ever voted for an independent? I did with H Ross, the great sucking sound himself, the 1'st time he ran. I wish we could get a moderate 3'rd party to pull down his numbers in 2008, but I don't think it will happen.

To: Road Walker who wrote (6)	6/12/2005 1:53:34 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 492

re: Does the order reflect an intended ranking? ... I'd be inclined to place 2) in the top slot... No, and I agree. Since the assumption is that what benefits the middle class is good for the country... then what's good for the middle class is almost by definition pragmatic. In terms of a name, why not take a page from the two existing party......Democrats for Democracy, Republicans for the Republic.....hence, the American party or some variation on American. ted