SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: haqihana who wrote (119673)6/12/2005 6:19:48 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793801
 
I don't think anyone should beat anyone else up over the suggestion that a body is meat. That's just such an odd concept to me. A body rots like meat. It burns like meat. It used to be a person, but once it is dead it is pretty much meat. Obviously you can argue it is more- but science is on my side, since it behaves chemically like any other meat, and if I test it, it will test like any other meat.

I'm not sure I would say I am fond of calling bodies meat, any more than I am fond of calling trees trees. It just seems to be the way things are. I can't understand getting upset with someone for seeing the world the way they see it. But there you are, I'm different.

I don't want anyone to beat you up because you don't think a body is meat. I hope no one ever would, and I wouldn't suggest any group of people would, or ought to, or that they would be at all justified in doing so.



To: haqihana who wrote (119673)6/12/2005 10:54:20 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793801
 
I wanted to say thank you for not being personal. It was interesting to hear your point of view, even though it was different from my own. I do hope you are wrong about marines beating people up, but aside from that I found your comments interesting, and I hope you did not think I was insulting you in any way, or trying to be outrageous. I simply posted ideas of mine, that are common to my family. I am glad you shared your ideas with me. (and I did not want you to think what I wrote about personal attacks applied at all to you, because it didn't, but SI can be confusing, and I wanted to be very plain on that. Thanks again for the conversation.)