SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Greg or e who wrote (20364)6/14/2005 4:30:04 AM
From: average joe  Respond to of 28931
 
"Not being wanted is not a sufficient reason to kill someone."

What if God does not want them? You sanctimonious little twit.

siliconinvestor.com



To: Greg or e who wrote (20364)6/14/2005 11:04:32 AM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 28931
 
Not being wanted is not a sufficient reason to kill someone.

It's sufficent reason for shaving your beard, or getting rhinoplasty. All those kill cells.

You really have a pecular way of thinking (not that it is uncommon). Being wanted is probably the most important trait in the decision of whether to have a child or not. It's absurd to think that there is somekind of laudable goal in trying to maximize the number of babies born when their own mothers don't want them.

TP



To: Greg or e who wrote (20364)6/15/2005 4:48:44 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
"Humanity of the unborn. Not being wanted is not a sufficient reason to kill someone. I have demonstrated that there is no essential difference between the unborn fetus and a child, in fact it is clear that a fetus can be older and much more developed than a child."

There are some all important differences between an unborn fetus and a child. Some of them are un-discussable in company mixed with moral absolutists vs moral relativists and believers vs non-believers. For example: If you consider ensolement to be an essential characteristic of humanity, then you must determine that the fetus qualifies. It is not possible for the sake of a discussion such as this to do so. A fetus may be scientifically homo-sapien but does it qualify as a person with a soul, and if so at what point? I doubt that we can make a conclusive determination on that.