Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (65023)	6/14/2005 11:19:01 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

The aircraft crashing into the WTC were about half loaded (10,000 gals) when they hit. From Raymonds link posted earlier. 911research.wtc7.net Hence my question whether the Aluminum from the aircraft melted/and or burned during the impact fire. If the aircraft burned into the concrete, that would have been a hot spot in the fire. If the aluminum skin of the aircraft did not melt, I don't think the large mass of steel could have been heated up much. There must be plenty of evidence around to measure how hot the fire got, may even for how long. A temperature by time profile inside the building where the collapse started.